Відео

When you deny the Resurrection, you can debate if that’s an ANTICHRIST, clearly

1:37:25 Biggest dodge non-answer in the history of debate

KJVO

I was a little surprised MDr. Licona didn't mention Dr. Michael Heiser concerning Enoch, where we learn of the sins of the Elohim and it ties with Gen 6:1-4. Heiser has two commentaries in 1 Enoch

This is all accurate. If we get upset it's because we're lazy and simply follow the culture. I'm totally ok with the errors. It does nothing but push me towards my savior in faith by His grace.

You should have kept with the KJV! If it was good enough for Paul it should have been good enough for us!!!

Wait. We grow in faith and knowledge???????

I think the idea of inerrancy arose as a counter to the ideas being presented in modernism, that nothing sticks on the wall when examined. Contra that, inerrancy says too much, that everything sticks on the wall, except for 1000s of exception cases explained in books. I prefer to say what Scripture claims, that Scripture is inspired by God and authoritative for one's active faith.

If there are errors in the Bible, then the implications for our faith and for who God is--or if He even exists--are megalithic. If God is not capable of protecting His word through the ages, then is He truly all-powerful? How does a great Bible scholar reconcile his scholarly findings with the belief in an almighty God, or with the belief that the Bible is actually a divinely inspired document? Is it really? What does all this say about the foundation of Christian faith? That foundation seems to be a foundation on sand--if Dr. Licona's assertions are true. Is the good Doctor working to support the Christian faith or to destroy its very foundations?

Legendary Biblical scholar

Completely agree.

Iran needs true Democracy 🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅🦅

Mike Licona… the GOAT whose debate with Shankar alli brought us nabeel and David Wood. Thank you

When the new testament was written, it was written by eye witness, and not by people like Mel Gibson or anyone like him. That Muslemis trying to confuse the real bible with movie story writer's. They don't care if the story of the Lord Jesus is told correctly or not, so long as they make millions of dollars. People are not equal to Jesus, Jesus is the son of God which makes him God.

Mel Gibson is a movie actor, he only made the movie of the crucifixion to make money from the movie. So if you ask, was jesus the one on the cross, or Jesus didn't appear to the disiples in the bodily form, the son of God can appear in front of any one in spirit or bodily form at any time he wishes to. Because he is the son of God.

Amen, praise the Lord Jesus!🙏❤️🙏❤️

Bye bye👋👋 Just alah☝️ Takbeer

It’s ironic that you say around 1:43:21-1:43:28 that you have to interpret the vague according to the clear statements, yet Christianity is literally based on the complete opposite; where you interpret the vague passages & then interpret the clear passages using the interpretation from the vague passage you chose.

("to place emphasis on")

Thank God. May the ideology of islam be wiped out. I pray that all muslims come to Jesus

What would be the difference between „flexible inerrancy“ and „infallibility“? Don‘t we already have a well established theological term for what Mike Licona is describing here?

What a great video. I subscribed and thumbs up. I will be watching part 1 and 3 and if more? I am a singer songwriter as my hobby. I am retired fighting leukemia. I am winning. Healed by the blood of the lamb. No weapon formed against me shall proper in Jesus' name. I study the Bible. I have most of my life. I have attended many classes. I have no degree but close to a thousand credits, unites. I have sang, taught, and preached on the streets and in buildings. I am now beginning to read these other books. I do not know why i never took the time to read them. I have 105 the complete Ethiopian Bible put together by Dr. D. L. Nelson. I am in Enoch 1, section 3. I will be reading the other books written by the early church leaders. I heard 1 Clement is almost word for word of the book to the Hebrews? I read a dictated book from a live service teaching. I like to imagine Paul and Peter preaching, a tag team in Rome and someone dictated them preaching. lol I have a vivid imagination. Anyway, I understand a little more listening to you and Lee. What a great honor. Thank you.

Shabir is extremely ignorant and ridiculous. He is clueless about the Bible. He keeps referencing Mel Gibson and this Brown guy who isn't an apostles. Lots of words that make no sense.

So… eliminating all the nebulous verbiage by this speaker… if god’s hand can alter the laws of nature that’s the exact same thing as god overriding the laws of nature. Stop splitting hairs. And there is no and never has been ANY reliable evidence that god exists and that god can interfere with the laws of nature. None !! Except the words of certain people bound to start a new religion because history has revealed that’s one of the best ways to squeeze money and other resources out of emotionally desperate people. Religion is BIG business. So much so America has become the Mecca of absurdities. A nation of desperate people concocting stories of desperation. And how to avoid desperation… replace it with delusion.

Shabir failed to realize how heavy Jesus crime is from the eyes of the roman government, claiming you are king besides the emperor automatically earned you a death sentence. The soldiers would make sure you are dead. The soldiers are accustomed to death, surely they would know if you are faking it. 🤣

Your thesis was a great help to me. It's answered most of my questions. God bless you, Dr Mike. Adullam From Nigeria

What matters is not in the census, but the heart. I choose to not embrace Islam when I was younger, but later in life, having learn theology, I embrace Islam with conviction. Islam don't need the people. People need Islam.

Survey was digital, so it only reflects the population of Iranians with access to a computer. Imagine that

Muslims believe in Judgement Day, or yawm al-din, which is a fundamental aspect of their faith. On this day, Allah will judge people for their actions in life and decide how they will spend their afterlife. Muslims believe that when they die, they will remain in their graves until Judgement Day, when they will be resurrected and brought before Allah. An angel named Israfil will announce the Day of Judgement by blowing a trumpet, and the bodies of the dead will gather on the plain of Arafat. This stated, if Shabir Ally didn't believe that Jesus was resurrected from the dead...does he deny the fundamental aspect of their faith in which his religion promotes on the topic?

Although this debate was reasonably conducted by "educated people"...I must admit it falls short of the reality that God created the universe, Earth and ultimately Mankind for a specific reason which had NOTHING to do with both religions. According to 1 John 3:8: "Whoever makes a practice of sinning is of the devil, for the devil has been sinning from the beginning. The reason the Son of God appeared was to destroy the works of the devil." Relative to this Scripture, (2) vitally important issues were not addressed during the debate: 1. What is SIN? 2. What does the significance of Son of God's appearance "to destroy the works of the devil" hold? Most believe Jesus came to create the religious following known as, "Christianity." This view is refuted by this passage. It states He appeared "to destroy the works of the devil" "for the devil has been sinning from the beginning." This indicates SIN is not religious; it's LEGAL. Scripture tells us it is the violation of "Divine Law." The edict from Heaven's Court specifies, "ALL have sinned and fallen short of the Glory (legal standard) of God." The ONLY remedy for this violation is DEATH; the shedding of Blood. My Muslim friend fails to understand the legal requirement for the SIN and my Christian Brother failed to adequately expose him to the fact that "the Son of God" appeared to destroy the works of the devil. It was he who introduced LAWLESSNESS (the practice of SIN) into the material realm. As an eternal issue, If Jesus had NOT appeared for this purpose SIN (which started in the heart of this rogue eternal being; infecting the material realm) would have gone on FOREVER corrupting everything eternally; left unchecked. Since blood was required to destroy the works of the devil, the following Scripture carries major purpose in the appearing of the Son of God: “Indeed, under the LAW almost everything is purified with blood, and without the shedding of blood there is no forgiveness of sins” (Heb. 9:22). For this reason the Son of Gods appearance was necessary... to satisfy the LAW and legally address the SINS of the world (John 3:16). Add to this, He was NOT a violator of Divine Law, but willfully became the Lamb of God to take away the infractions of our SIN. This satisfied the legal requirement of death through the shedding of blood under the LAW. BECAUSE HE WAS FOUND "NOT GUILTY" according to Heaven's Court, His life had to be judiciously restored based on the "Law of Reparation" devised to repair that which was broken. He didn't SIN therefore under the this provision under the LAW He wasn't supposed to die. The Resurrection of Jesus from the dead is proof that God (the True Judge) did not allow this innocent Man to stay in the grave after He laid down His life for Mankind as the First born of the Family of God.

Wow Mike just wow. So if this extremely outlandish scenario ever happened wouldn't you believe an extremely outlandish explanation for it? 😂😂😂

So called religion of peace

I can always appreciate your work Mike, very thorough and informative, thank you for this excellent video. Definitely doing The Father's work and fulfilling your role in the body

Evangelicals have been debating what “inerrancy” means for a long time. See the history of such debates in the book, Inerrant the Wind; The Troubled House of North American Evangelicals

I appreciate the Licona stays respectful and kind. Ehrman is condescending and abrupt. It’s sooooo annoying to watch. Make your points without needing to be demeaning.

. Who won? Honesty and dignity won. Thank you Mike and Shabir, for presenting a lot of insights in a respectful way. May the truth prevail.

Poor questioner really doesn’t know what he’s talking about.

I enjoyed our discussion, Mike!

This is the worst trash talker of since man was first created i give you this medal fake person and your made up following is another stitch in your own holes

You have changed my life Mike

Two extremely odd views from both of them

Do physicists believe that the laws of nature are not able to be violated? No, the "laws of physics" are provisional. They change as we get more information. The laws of physics are not derived from pure logic and so must necessarily be true for all eternity. They are reverse engineering equations that we use because the so far seem to work. Miracles do not violate the laws of nature; they are consistent with the true laws of nature that we don't understand yet.

Asker is stating theoretical hypotheses as fact. Shifting goalposts. Dishonest philosophy. Anything to reject God.

considering shias as muslims is maddddddddddddd

قال الله تعالى:لو أن أولكم وآخركم وإنسكم وجنكم كانوا على أفجر قلب رجل واحد منكم ما نقص ذلك من ملكي شيئً

Plain and simple in most islamic lands

To what is the so-called resurrection relevant, or what is the syllogism of which the resurrection is a premise? I

LIcona clearly has an agenda, he's a salesman trying to sell jesus. But I give him all the credit for wearing a 1970's seiko automatic. Nice. Wearing one i rebuilt right now.

haha man that's funny. He has faith in multiverse. Dang. That's bold faith.

What's the evidence that the multiverse exists? Movies?